Suppressed News.com Logo
World News National News Alabama News Immigration News MidEast News Media Watch




newsletter
Archives


Buy a Text Ad
Under $.20/1000

Liberal
Repellant

Order Yours Today!
noveltyair.com


Ten Commandments
Gifts,Yard Signs, T-Shirts

observethe
tencommandments.info


Promotional
Advertising

Political or Business
Yard Signs, T-Shirts, Stickers
yard-sign.biz


Ten Commandments News
Latest Info In The Battle

 


   
Printer Friendly  

National News

Conservative News


SuppressedNews Feature

The Seamless Garmet

By Joe Sobran


Sobran Posted on: September 3, 2005

The late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin, former archbishop of Chicago, endeared himself to liberals, especially liberal Catholic politicians, by adopting the metaphor of life as a "seamless garment." It isn't enough to oppose abortion, he insisted; to be consistent, you have to defend life on every front, as for instance by relieving poverty and illness.

This came as welcome news to the liberals, since it turned "life" into a checklist, in which abortion was only one of many items, and not necessarily the most urgent. You could be "pro-life," according to the Bernardin standard, merely by supporting the welfare state.

Well, of course life is, in some sense, a seamless garment. We should oppose abortion on the same principle that we should oppose the bombing of cities. But according to Bernardin's way of thinking, you mustn't oppose bombing Hiroshima unless you also favor setting up an anti-poverty program there.

Conservative Catholics smelled a rat. They sensed that this "seamless garment" was really just a way of minimizing the special problem of abortion, at a time when more than a million abortions were being performed in America every year.

Liberal Catholics, on the other hand, loved the idea. But somehow the imperative of consistency worked only one way. We never heard any of them say, "Well, it's not enough for me to support the welfare state. If I'm really going to be pro-life, I must also fight to end legal abortion." Politicians like New York's Mario Cuomo felt they had been vindicated in their empty "personal" opposition to abortion.

You know that familiar line: "I am personally opposed to abortion, but ..." But you weren't going to do anything about it. If you opposed it "personally," you were in favor of it practically. And everyone knew it.

Abortion remains legal today thanks in large part to all those nominal Catholic politicians who oppose it -- "personally." That telltale adverb must lift the hearts of abortionists everywhere.

Cuomo is still at it. He recently told NBC's Tim Russert that "we" -- we Catholics -- are "hypocrites" because we say we oppose contraception even though most of "us" use contraceptives like other people. Of course, it goes without saying, people who call themselves Catholics while constantly subverting Catholic morality aren't guilty of hypocrisy. To hear Cuomo tell it, he's one of the few honest Catholics in politics. So why do so many other Catholic pols talk like him?

But has anyone ever refrained from getting or procuring an abortion because people like Cuomo "personally" disapprove of it? Extremely doubtful. Their message is clear: "I can't give my blessing to any abortion, but please don't let me discourage you from getting one. I wouldn't want to impose my beliefs on anyone."

I sometimes wonder how such Catholics would behave if their alleged "beliefs" were sincere. It's probably a purely hypothetical question, but if they really thought, felt, and acted as if abortion were evil, without wishing to ban it by law, surely there are ways to give this view real force.

Public opinion can be powerful even when it isn't backed up by force of law. If you advertise allegiance to the Ku Klux Klan, you'll soon find yourself ostracized by people who don't question your legal right to join the Klan.

In the same way, the country would change dramatically if every Catholic who professes "personal" opposition to feticide would peacefully picket abortion clinics. But can anyone even imagine a Cuomo, let alone a Ted Kennedy, doing even that much?

Even so, the country is changing. Abortion rates over the past decade have reportedly plunged dramatically. The Democratic Party is now uncomfortable about its unreserved public identification with the cause of "choice." Even Hillary Clinton has voiced reservations about the practice -- and has probably made more impact thereby than all the liberal Catholics in America put together.

So the "seamless garment" has turned out to be nothing but a loophole for hypocritical Catholic politicians. If anything, it has actually made it easier for them than for non-Catholics to give their effective support to legal abortion -- that is, it has allowed them to be inconsistent and unprincipled about the very issues that Cardinal Bernardin said demand consistency and principle.

---------------------------------------------



Joe Sobran is an author, syndicated columnist, and editor of a monthly newsletter, SOBRAN'S. See www.sobran.com for a free sample or call 800-513-5053.
This article is reprinted with permission.
 
 Copyright (c) 2005 by The Vere Company,  All rights reserved.




 
Google
Web SuppressedNews.com
Commentary by Joe Sobran
Jim Jackson
Hugh McInnish
Brad Taylor
Commentary by Gary Palmer
Suppressed Cartoons

Get our RSS Newsfeed!

In Association with Amazon.com

CrossDaily.com

 
 
       
       
Footer Bar
 

SuppressedNews.com

Copyright © 2004: All material property of Suppressed News.


Reprints and Reposts by Permission Only. A Taylor Media Website

Powered by Coranto